Flow in Music Performance: From Theory to Educational Applications

Flow represents a specific state of consciousness in which individuals become fully immersed and concentrated on a task, losing track of time and feeling as though actions occur unconsciously. This article provides a concise overview of flow in music, concentrating on music performance while examining psychological correlates, occurrence patterns, and educational applications. The goal is to connect theoretical knowledge with practical implications for enhancing musical practice.

Numerous studies have examined flow across various musical activities, including improvisation, composition, listening, and performance. Music improvisation stands out as one of the most significant pedagogical tools for cultivating flow from the earliest stages of music education. Flow in music performance has received the most extensive research attention, leading to practical insights that could facilitate optimal experience and flow conditions. Educational strategies based on Csikszentmihalyi's nine characteristics of flow are presented in the final section.

Understanding Flow in Musicians

Flow is a multidimensional state of consciousness that emerges when individuals feel sufficiently in control to engage in personally meaningful activities. People experiencing flow become completely absorbed in completing pleasant, fulfilling tasks. Since the rise of positive psychology in the 1990s, research has increasingly focused on positive aspects of psychological functioning within the psychology of music performance. Studies investigating pre-performance excitement — whether in beginners or elite musicians — have shifted attention from performance anxiety toward flow.

Flow encompasses cognitive, physiological, and affective dimensions, corresponding to a peak psychophysical state. Performers such as musicians and athletes describe flow as achieving high performance in activities demanding intense concentration. They become fully immersed, their attention completely absorbed, experiencing profound enjoyment and optimal engagement. Flow research identifies nine characteristics: balance between challenge and skill, merging of action and awareness, clear goals, unambiguous feedback, concentration on the task, sense of control, loss of self-consciousness, distorted time perception, and autotelic (self-rewarding) experience.

The challenge-skill balance is fundamental for inducing flow. There must be equilibrium between task complexity and performer abilities. Activities defined appropriately according to skill levels keep performers engaged; tasks that are too easy lead to boredom, while overly difficult tasks discourage successful completion. Flow depends on finding this delicate balance between challenge and capability.

Flow emerges when activities prove intriguing and contain sufficient risk to stretch musicians' capacities. Musicians become intrinsically motivated by the quality of their experience. They describe flow as an ecstatic state in which music seems to arise spontaneously, creating a mysterious harmony between body and mind. During flow, performers experience a trance-like state while producing their best work. This optimal experience relates to emotional aspects and subjective wellbeing in music performance, encouraging musicians to repeat similar actions.

Researchers have examined flow across various musical contexts, including performance, practice, improvisation, composition, and listening.

Flow and Music Listening

Research on flow during music listening remains limited. Listeners describe becoming absorbed by the music, losing awareness of their surroundings. Flow occurs when participants concentrate fully on the music. Concentration proves particularly important for inducing flow when listening to complex music. High levels of focus and involvement constitute necessary conditions for music to evoke a state of immersion. Studies examining flow during listening and subjective wellbeing have found stronger relationships between flow and wellbeing among individuals with highly flexible self-concepts.

Flow during listening depends on various factors, including musical style. Groovy, upbeat music that encourages dancing creates favorable conditions for experiencing flow. Groove refers to the degree to which music urges listeners to generate movement. Groovy music maximizes motor affordances and sensorimotor entrainment while incorporating syncopation that heightens listener expectations and maintains optimal interest. Spontaneous dancing to groovy music particularly facilitates flow; when people dance to upbeat music, their movements may feel effortless, automatic, and almost unconsciously produced.

Flow and Music Practice

Flow connects strongly to practice quality. Music learning requires acquiring basic performance skills, and success demands countless hours dedicated to rehearsing difficult passages. Achieving excellence requires enormous time investment. Skilled actions must be refined through motor learning mechanisms involving both mental and physical practice. Musicians spend hours completely absorbed in the score, a characteristic feature of flow. Performers must avoid interruptions, which disrupt concentration and prevent achieving flow.

Musicians need effective methods for studying musical scores. Practice must achieve high quality and develop awareness of abilities rather than consisting of mechanical repetition. Self-regulated learning strategies should be adopted to master processes, and practice must become internalized. Musicians direct mental resources toward the piece, addressing motor, cognitive, and expressive aspects. Music possesses an expressive dimension that creates complex dynamics and determines emotional meaning.

Flow and Music Performance

Music performance demands deep task involvement; while performing, musicians focus entirely on the music. This state produces empathy and identification with the musical piece that profoundly engages performers. High degrees of absorption and concentration prove necessary for achieving perfect performance. During flow, musicians focus on the creative moment and in their best performances report surpassing cognitive limits. Flow increases expressiveness and imagination, allowing musicians to experiment comfortably with new musical ideas.

Another requirement for performing music involves interacting with the audience, transferring the results of practice to concert situations. Flow can occur during both rehearsals and concerts, though live performance with an audience most readily creates conditions for flow. Artists often perform at their best during concerts because the performance activates multifaceted processes with the audience in a transcendent experience. The concert context and audience can inspire flow. Audience members attending live performances tune in to capture musical details, establishing complex auditory communication with artists. Mutual immersion and intensive attention to music create ideal conditions for entering flow. However, flow remains difficult to predict due to variable performance contexts. Interpersonal differences can interfere, and if stage fright arises, audience feedback may impede flow.

Individual and Contextual Differences in Experiencing Flow

Previous research has examined individual and contextual differences in experiencing flow, presenting varying views on controlling flow. Some researchers argue that proper training enables musicians, athletes, and dancers to develop some control over flow experiences. Studies of elite athletes indicate that 71 percent of participants considered both flow and its inducing factors at least partly controllable. Conversely, factors that disrupted flow, such as meteorological changes and atmospheric phenomena, were deemed uncontrollable.

While controlling flow induction remains difficult, developing a mental mindset that supports its achievement is possible. To experience flow, performers must be convinced that nothing matters more than the current activity and that their skills suffice for the task. Musicians must demonstrate ability to manage resources for carrying out the activity by modulating inspiration, commitment, and ability. Even accounting for interpersonal variability, individual differences and psychological characteristics either facilitate or hinder the flow process. Intrinsic motivation can serve as a key driver for entering flow, enhancing confidence and concentration.

Multiple external and internal circumstances can interfere with flow. External circumstances include contextual aspects and negative environmental conditions, while internal states include issues such as anxiety and impatience. Hectic noisy settings can preclude the concentration needed for flow, although wide variability exists among individuals. Atmospheric conditions such as windy or rainy days during outdoor performances can pose problems. Social environment represents another external condition that can facilitate or inhibit flow, providing appropriate support for optimal experience.

Regarding internal factors, nervousness develops when performers question their abilities or when situations cause distress. Music performance anxiety represents an internal factor, and flow may help alleviate such anxiety. Impatience negatively affects concentration, potentially causing musicians to take longer to become engaged. Concentrating on the task and focusing all mental resources on the activity at hand remains crucial. Behaviors watching YouTube, frequently checking email, and general internet surfing distract from central activities and hinder flow achievement. Practical interruptions remain necessary for daily life, as it is impossible to perform tasks like playing trombone continuously.

Other relevant internal conditions that can facilitate or inhibit flow include preparation quality, attentional focus, awareness of abilities and self, and connection to the body. Allowing sufficient time for organizing performance ensures high-quality preparation. Specific attentional focus directs all mental attitudes toward the activity. Musicians must develop awareness of their skills and self to build confidence. Connection to the body must be developed according to current interactive and embodied approaches to human cognition. Contextual and individual differences also matter during improvisation, an activity deeply linked to flow.

Flow and Music Improvisation

Music improvisation represents one of the most natural, spontaneous, creative, and developmentally grounded actions. Improvisation involves playfulness, authenticity, flexibility, and originality while representing constant coping with the fear of mistakes. Successful improvisation requires letting go. Multiple studies emphasize the importance of improvisation in experiencing flow. The improvisatory state of mind shares aspects with flow as characterized by Csikszentmihalyi. Jazz singers experience flow when improvisation goes well. Improvisation can serve as an educational method to help musicians overcome analytical thinking and adopt creative holistic approaches while performing. Stepping away from fixed mindsets focused on getting it right and creating the highest quality performance emphasizes playfulness and variation.

Music improvisation can function as one of the most effective didactic tools for promoting flow from the earliest stages of music learning. Flow during improvisation enhances sense of fluency and spontaneity, including artists' experiences of intense focus, control, and delight. Flow represents a crucial component in improvisation, defined as one of eight different mental processes occurring during improvisation. Neuroscience provides additional support for flow as a key improvisation component. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, crucial for cognitive regulation, displays strong deactivation during improvisation. As improvisation becomes less constrained and more sophisticated, this deactivation becomes more prominent. These activity decreases could represent neurological correlates of flow, indicating reduced top-down control and self-awareness that may result in different outcomes.

Beyond improvisation, other strategies for promoting flow derive from the nine dimensions of flow.

Strategies for Promoting Flow in Musicians

Flow research extends beyond theoretical analysis of intrinsic characteristics, offering applications for improving quality of life and promoting wellbeing. Flow could benefit music education by helping musicians enhance practice levels and performance value. Flow principles can assess and regulate learning, with activities such as task planning crucial for improving student engagement.

Several actions linked to the nine flow characteristics can increase flow experiences. Music performers should:

1. Regulate balance between performing competencies and appropriate challenges
2. Establish control over performance while maintaining attention on the activity
3. Define clear, well-planned authentic goals
4. Nurture self-reflection
5. Avoid distractions and concentrate on necessary task elements
6. Feel comfortable before starting to enhance sense of control and create relaxed atmosphere
7. Focus on musical expression to engage all senses for communicating with other performers
8. Promote sense of timelessness allowing immersion in playing for extended periods
9. Create internally rewarding performing conditions facilitating feelings of joy and fulfillment

Maintaining challenge and skill balance begins with a detailed task analysis that defines the abilities required to perform a musical piece. The musician clearly must possess those abilities; otherwise, a gap emerges between the piece’s demands and the player’s capabilities (Fullagar et al., 2013). The activity should be calibrated to the performer’s skill: not too easy and not excessively difficult. An overly simple task causes boredom, whereas an impossibly hard one discourages effort. Flow depends on finding equilibrium between task complexity and performer skill. Musicians must develop the required aptitudes while adjusting the challenge upward when the activity becomes boring. Tasks must be feasible and demand skills properly matched to the performer’s level, a principle music teachers can apply when selecting appropriate repertoire for students (Bakker, 2005). Psychological skill matters in this balance, too. A musician may be highly proficient at technique and expression yet have a personality prone to anxiety; in such a case the musical challenge must align with those psychological tendencies (Ford et al., 2020). Teachers should be aware of students’ psychological profiles and offer basic strategies for managing pre‑performance arousal (Gill, 2020; Tan & Sin, 2020). Job resources such as performance evaluation, autonomy, social support, and supervisory coaching, when applied to teachers and students alike, positively influence the skill–challenge equilibrium and promote flow (Bakker, 2005; Csikszentmihalyi, 1997).

Action and awareness merging fosters concentration and high‑level performance. Participants must focus on the task and develop control over their movements. Linking body and mind is fundamental to peak performance and flow (Altosaar et al., 2019; Tang & Bruya, 2017). Practices such as yoga, the Alexander Technique, and the Feldenkrais method (Schlinger, 2006)—all based on the premise that bodily change can alter mental states—can facilitate action‑awareness merging. In music education, supporting embodied learning helps students enter flow this way (Leman et al., 2017). Teachers should encourage learners to attend to their bodies and trust their inner wisdom (Bloom & Skutnick‑Henley, 2005). When a musician’s movements are natural and authentic, awareness more readily merges with action.

Clear goals are an essential element of curriculum design. Every activity should have an overarching objective along with a realistic set of sub‑objectives, all of which must be clear and achievable (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The musician needs a distinct purpose and a precise idea of what to do and how to proceed, especially in performance practice. At each passage, the performer knows which notes to play and is guided by the progressive achievement of these sub‑goals. Deliberate practice should be encouraged (Ericsson & Harwell, 2019) to build performance confidence; this includes designing a practice‑and‑performance plan with honest, attainable goals. Close collaboration between teacher and learner in setting clear goals is vital (Bakker, 2005). When the student contributes to goal‑setting, they feel more ownership of the outcome, greater control of the learning process, and consequently more relaxed and confident—a state that facilitates flow. Teaching students to self‑regulate their practice and performance holds great value (Concina, 2019). Araújo (2016) studied expert musicians’ self‑regulated practice strategies and identified three behavioral categories: organising practice, managing personal resources, and managing external resources. The first covers planning, structuring, and monitoring goals; the second includes setting goals that must be achieved; and the third highlights the role of social support in attaining practice objectives.

Explicitly training metacognitive skills in music classes helps students recognize the role of strategic behaviour in improving their learning (Benton, 2013). Among classically trained musicians, the capacity to self‑regulate behaviours such as using personal resources is directly linked to flow. Flow experience here correlates with indicators of musical skill, the nature of tasks, clarity of goals and feedback, concentration, and a sense of control over the activity (Araújo & Hein, 2016).

Unambiguous feedback is crucial for evaluating progress, verifying goal attainment, and testing the soundness of the overall plan. Feedback can range from self‑observation while mastering a new concept or skill to comments and suggestions from teachers, coaches, peers, or supervisors. It helps improve performance, boost confidence, and handle even routine learning situations (McPherson et al., 2022). Performers should monitor their performance using real‑time cues and then adjust accordingly. By using real‑time feedback, musicians learn to monitor their playing and refine difficult passages. Several strategies enhance feedback quality in music education: teachers should rely more on dialogue than monologue, keep feedback specific and improvement–focused, avoid confusing it with praise, and ensure it is meaningful. Once feedback is given, the teacher should verify that the student correctly understood it and whether it was effective, adapting it as necessary to meet the student’s needs (McPherson et al., 2022). Moreover, performers’ awareness of direct feedback during music activities should be cultivated and practiced (Altosaar et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019).

Concentration on the task requires musicians to develop a mindset that filters out everything irrelevant. All attentional resources must be devoted to executing the activity so that it becomes the entire content of the working‑memory buffer. Narrowing the focus of awareness creates a sort of filter that blocks unrelated perceptions and thoughts. Staying absorbed in the activity and avoiding distractions directly improves performance quality. Creating an ideal practice environment with minimal distractions and interruptions can facilitate concentration. Today, smartphones represent a major distraction, especially for youth (Zhao et al., 2022). Studies have repeatedly shown that smartphone use disrupts focus on the main task, interferes with cognitive processes and capacities (Marsh & Rajaram, 2019; Ward et al., 2017), and impairs thinking, memory, attention, and emotion regulation (Canale et al., 2019; Wilmer et al., 2017). Based on this evidence, music students should remove smartphones from their practice space to eliminate such distractions during training.

Sense of control is something trained musicians typically possess to a considerable degree (Brown et al., 2015). They feel able to dominate the situation and to not worry about failure or loss of control, as they are intensely engaged in the task. External factors, including failure itself, become less relevant, leaving them with a consistent sense of success (Pecen et al., 2017). Becoming comfortable before beginning to play can enhance this feeling of control and create a relaxed state during the performance. Control comes both from the quantity and the quality of practice. The belief that one has control may act as a predisposition that supports entering flow; it can be developed at physical and psychological levels. On the physical side, it arises from deliberate practice of technical and expressive skills; nevertheless, psychological abilities for cognitive and emotional self‑regulation are equally important.

Loss of self‑awareness involves higher‑order processes; the activity absorbs almost all of the musician’s mental and self‑reflective resources. No residual cognitive capacity remains for processing anything else—the performer’s focus is wholly taken up by making music. Musicians must feel immersed in expressing themselves while they play, empathizing with the music and tuning into it. They should use all their senses to connect with co‑performers by focusing on the expressive dimension. This experience is closely tied to transcendent feelings experienced while in flow (Bernard, 2009). Shedding self‑awareness is a long process of personal growth. The music teacher has a role in encouraging students to engage with the deeper meaning of music making.

Concerning a distorted sense of time, in flow the perception of time is altered: it seems to speed up for activities in which one is fully absorbed and to drag when one is not truly committed. A sense of timelessness also characterizes altered states of consciousness. With the right mixture of factors, musicians can easily become immersed in playing for long stretches without realising it. To access this timeless dimension, a musician must be fully absorbed in the “here and now” (Sinnet et al., 2020), which is closely linked to the loss of self‑awareness. Both experiences can be seen as consequences of total concentration and immersion, coming hand in hand with task‑focus.

Autotelic experiences are those in which the incentive comes from within—enjoying the activity for its own sake supplies intrinsic motivation. Music performance should be a source of pleasure that itself constitutes a reward, directly tied to the act of making music. The aim is to create conditions that drive musicians by inner purpose and authentic curiosity. Players can find joy in tackling challenging new repertoire, exploring new musical styles, joining or creating new ensembles, or expanding the venues in which they perform. They should approach pieces playfully, seekers of novel features and expressive opportunities. It can be useful to develop imaginative ideas about music, discovering uncharted aspects and enriching a composition with personal feeling and imagery about what it might convey. The core of this is finding enjoyment from within. Kirchner (2011) suggested that a disposition toward experiencing flow may take hold when certain conditions are met: setting goals, feeling self‑assured, having a drive to try new things and express oneself through the activity, being capable of sustaining attention, and being able to perform without self‑criticism.

Ultimately, flow can generate a sense of well‑being that counteracts negative aspects of performing. Musicians can derive psychological well‑being from performance by using flow as a source of optimal experience.

Conclusions

This article provided an overview of flow studies focused on music performance, along with a strategic approach to creating optimal conditions that encourage flow. Flow is a multidimensional state characterised by deep engagement, total absorption, concentration, emotional expressiveness, and creative imagination. Social interaction during group music activities is a key facilitator of flow.

Although inducing flow remains challenging, Csikszentmihalyi (1990) argued that a mental attitude conducive to achieving flow can be cultivated. Performers need to believe that what they are doing is important and that their abilities are sufficient for the challenge (Fullagar et al., 2013). Furthermore, musicians must be aware that they can direct their own inspiration and commitment. They have to master the skills to manage resources and successfully finish the task. Creating flow‑friendly conditions during practice is crucial. While individual differences and personality traits can help or hinder flow, performers are able to achieve it through their own dedication and capability. Intrinsic motivation, self‑confidence, and complete focus on the task at hand can all become important triggers of flow.

The current review stimulated several reflections that warrant further investigation. Future research could explore how flow enhances music performance in varied contexts to better understand the expression of human potential. Many ideas have emerged for educational applications of flow. The phenomenon is multifaceted and can characterize musical experience from early childhood through late adulthood—making it a transversal concept relevant at all stages. Flow theory can provide a foundation for developing practice management strategies and for techniques that reduce anxiety, increase perceived competence and self‑efficacy, and boost intrinsic motivation. Approaches such as body‑awareness work, cognitive restructuring, and concentration‑control techniques could improve the attentional aspects of music performance (Antonini Philippe, Kosirnik, et al., 2022). Ultimately, flow is a psychophysiological state—a catalyst that could be systematically harnessed to improve performance, linking the performer’s mind and body in a holistic way.

Custodero, L. A. (2011). The call to create: Flow experience in music learning and teaching. In D. Hargreaves, D. Miell, & R. Macdonald (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 369–384). Oxford University Press.

De Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2012). Goal-independent mechanisms for free response generation: Creative and pseudo-random performance share neural substrates. NeuroImage, 59, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.016

Després, J. P., Burnard, P., Dubé, F., & Stévance, S. (2017). Expert Western classical music improvisers’ strategies. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417710777

Diaz, F. M. (2011). Mindfulness, attention, and flow during music listening: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 41(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611415144

Dolan, D., Jensen, H. J., Mediano, P. A. M., Molina-Solana, M., Rajpal, H., Rosas, F., & Sloboda, J. A. (2018). The improvisational state of mind: A multidisciplinary study of an improvisatory approach to classical music repertoire performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01341

Ericsson, K. A., & Harwell, K. W. (2019). Deliberate practice and proposed limits on the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: Why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396

Forbes, M. (2021). Giving voice to jazz singers’ experiences of flow in improvisation. Psychology of Music, 49(4), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735619899137

Ford, J. L., Vosloo, J., & Arvinen-Barrow, M. (2020). ‘Pouring everything that you are’: Musicians’ experiences of optimal performances. British Journal of Music Education, 37(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051720000078

Freer, P. K. (2009). Boys’ descriptions of their experiences in choral music. Research Studies in Music Education, 31(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X09344382

Fritz, B. S., & Avsec, A. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Psihološka Obzorja / Horizons of Psychology, 16(2), 5–17.

Fullagar, C. J., Knight, P. A., & Sovern, H. S. (2013). Challenge/skill balance, flow and performance anxiety. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62(2), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00494.x

Gill, A. (2020). Enhancing music performance self-efficacy through psychological skills training [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne.

Habe, K., Biasutti, M., & Kajtna, T. (2019). Flow and satisfaction with life in élite musicians and top athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00698

Habe, K., Biasutti, M., & Kajtna, T. (2021). Wellbeing and flow in sports and music students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100798

Iusca, D. (2015). The relationship between flow and music performance level of undergraduates in exam situations: The effect of musical instrument. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.376

Jackson, S. A. (1995). Factors influencing the occurrence of flow in élite athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209508406962

Kenny, B. J., & Gellrich, M. (2002). Improvisation. In R. Parncutt & G. E. McPherson (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 117–134). Oxford University Press.

Kirchner, J. M. (2011). Incorporating flow into practice and performance. Work, 40, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1232

Korošec, K., Susić, B. B., & Habe, K. (2022). Improvisation as the foundation of flow in music education: Connections to attitudes, gender and genre. Journal of Elementary Education, 15(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.15.3.339-356.2022

Landau, A. T., & Limb, C. J. (2017). The neuroscience of improvisation. Music Educators Journal, 103(3), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432116687373

Leman, M., Lesaffre, M., & Maes, P. J. (2017). Introduction: What is embodied music interaction? In M. Lesaffre, P. J. Maes, & M. Leman (Eds.), The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction (pp. 1–10). Routledge.

Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PloS One, 3, e1679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001679

Loepthien, T., & Leipold, B. (2022). Flow in music performance and music-listening: Differences in intensity, predictors, and the relationship between flow and subjective well-being. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620982056

MacDonald, R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606064838

Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019). The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001

Mazur, Z., & Laguna, M. (2019). The role of affect in practicing a musical instrument: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 47(6), 848–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735619861831

McPherson, M. J., Barrett, F. S., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Jiradejvong, P., & Limb, C. J. (2016). Emotional intent modulates the neural substrates of creativity: An fMRI study of emotionally targeted improvisation in jazz musicians. Scientific Reports, 6, 18460. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18460

McPherson, G. E., Blackwell, J., & Hattie, J. (2022). Feedback in music performance teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 891025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891025

Pecen, E., Collins, D. J., & MacNamara, Á. (2018). “It’s Your Problem. Deal with It.” Performers’ experiences of psychological challenges in music. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02374

Pinho, A. L., de Manzano, Ö., Fransson, P., Eriksson, H., & Ullén, F. (2014). Connecting to create: Expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 6156–6163. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4769-13.2014

Ruth, N., Spangardt, B., & Schramm, H. (2016). Alternative music playlists on the radio: Flow experience and appraisal during the reception of music radio programs. Musicae Scientiae, 21, 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916642623

Sawyer, K. (2015). Group flow and group genius. NAMTA Journal, 40(3), 29–52.

Schlinger, M. (2006). Feldenkrais method, Alexander technique, and yoga – body awareness therapy in the performing arts. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 17, 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2006.07.002

Schiavio, A., Biasutti, M., van der Schyff, D., & Parncutt, R. (2020). A matter of presence: A qualitative study on teaching individual and collective music classes. Musicae Scientiae, 24(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918808833

Schiavio, A., van der Schyff, D., Biasutti, M., Moran, N., & Parncutt, R. (2019). Instrumental technique, expressivity, and communication: A qualitative study on learning music in individual and collective settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00737

Sinnett, S., Jäger, J., Singer, S., & Antonini Philippe, R. (2020). Flow states and associated changes in spatial and temporal processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00381

Spahn, C., Krampe, F., & Nusseck, M. (2021). Live music performance: The relationship between flow and music performance anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 725569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725569

Tan, L., & Sin, H. X. (2019). Flow research in music contexts: A systematic literature review. Musicae Scientiae, 25(4), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919877564

Tang, Y. Y., & Bruya, B. (2017). Mechanisms of mind-body interaction and optimal performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00647

Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/691462

Williamon, A. (Ed.). (2004). Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance. Oxford University Press.

Wilmer, H. H., Sherman, L. E., & Chein, J. M. (2017). Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605

Witek, M. A., Clarke, E. F., Wallentin, M., Kringelbach, M. L., & Vuust, P. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PloS One, 9(4), e94446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094446

Wrigley, W. J., & Emmerson, S. B. (2013). The experience of the flow state in live music performance. Psychology of Music, 41(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611425903

Zhang, X., Shan, G., Wang, Y., Wan, B., & Li, H. (2019). Wearables, biomechanical feedback, and human motor-skills’ learning & optimization. Applied Sciences, 9(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020226

Zhao, X., Hu, T., Qiao, G., Li, C., Wu, M., Yang, F., & Zhou, J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the smartphone distraction scale in Chinese college students: Validity, reliability and influencing factors. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 859640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859640