How Leadership Works in the Music Business

Understanding leadership: an introduction

The Business Dictionary describes leadership as the act of guiding a group or an organization, or the capacity to do so. The definition adds that it means setting a clear vision, communicating that vision so others follow willingly, giving people the information and methods they need to reach the vision, and balancing the competing interests of all stakeholders. The same source notes that a leader steps forward during a crisis and can think and act creatively under difficult conditions.

Four core competencies define leadership: managing attention, managing meaning, managing trust, and managing self. Political scientist James MacGregor Burns, in his book Leadership, argued that transformational leadership is inherently charismatic and inspirational. It taps into the follower's deeper motives and higher needs, so that "the full person of the follower is engaged." A transformational leader thus requires both charisma and a clear vision.

Another approach—participative or back-room leadership—is low-profile and self-effacing. These leaders engage colleagues in decisions about purpose, objectives, and strategy without fanfare. They guide quietly, without making a show of motivating or committing people, especially when the right personnel are already in place.

What existing sources occasionally miss is that a single leadership style may not suit a nontraditional modern workplace. A band, for example, may need a blend of styles working together to be effective. Transformational leadership within a musical group appears to be exactly that kind of scenario.

The ethics of leadership: politics and fiction

Good leaders must also be ethical leaders. Unethical leaders can be effective in the short run—often through intimidation and fear—but history remembers them as villains. They tend to be charismatic personalities with a strong hunger for power.

Based on lectures about political science, unethical leaders tend to follow a recurring pattern to build power and control:

1. Speak to the fears of the "general will."
2. Win the masses’ confidence by scapegoating an "other."
3. Reassure people by insisting they champion the "general greater good."
4. Present themselves as part of the elite, yet for the people, claiming they can fight on the people's behalf.

These tactics drove Adolf Hitler's rise and, more recently, were seen in Donald Trump's successful 2016 presidential campaign. Hitler’s brand of leadership succeeded in his era, but pushed the world toward terror and, ultimately, societal collapse.

Political theory holds that roughly every 150 years the world reaches a political crisis that leads to economic and political collapse so society can rebuild. Unethical leaders often represent the final stage of each cycle. Some theorists say another such reform is due in our current decade. One scholar expressed hope that this century will be the first to avoid repeating that historical pattern.

Unethical leaders may be skilled at manipulating people, but that does not make them ethically sound. Truly great leaders can also be terrible individuals who commit horrific acts. Fictional characters show this tension too. In Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, Mr. Ollivander tells Harry, "We do not speak his name. The wand chooses the wizard, Mr. Potter. It's not always clear why, but I think it is clear that we can expect great things from you. After all, He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named did great things. Terrible, yes, but great." He recognized that Voldemort achieved powerful deeds even if they were evil. Though it is a novel, the example reveals a truth about leadership. Hitler, Trump, and Voldemort share common unethical tactics: manipulation, violence, and the hunger for control. Such leaders are not what the world needs. The world needs ethical leaders who make a positive difference.

Ethical leaders build relationships rooted in trust, respect, and support for their employees. They judge decisions not only by short-term results but also by long-term ethical consequences. Transformational leaders live through the good they create in the world, so ethics lie at the core of their leadership style.

The intertwining of transformational leadership

Real examples and fictional ones both show that leaders leave a mark on those around them—positive or negative—especially on the people they work with most closely. Choosing the kind of leader to become matters deeply. Any path can lead to great achievements, but leaders must decide whether to be remembered for improving society or for contributing to cycles of destruction and renewal. That choice sits at the heart of transformational leadership.

Transformational leaders genuinely care. They care about their colleagues, the impact they leave, and the work they do. Because they care so much about positive outcomes, they need to examine their actions carefully before taking them. Authenticity is essential, since authentic leadership demands responsible leadership.

Some leaders avoid both ethical extremes; these are called ethically silent leaders. For transformational leaders, silence is not an option. Ethical silence cannot produce the transformation that satisfies the leader’s own internal need for catharsis. Transformational leaders feel their surroundings deeply, gaining meaning from the positive change they create in others.

Today many people believe society has become less ethical. But that impression is misleading. Unethical behavior is nothing new; it simply gets exposed more in the digital age. Finding empirical proof of changes over time is hard. Media outlets command greater attention now than in the past, which skews the picture. Data that appears to show rising wrongdoing accumulates without being unexamined. In reality, unethical practices existed in the past as much as they do now; exposure, not prevalence, has increased.

This shift matters fundamentally for musicians, who face constant scrutiny in the limelight. They operate under a microscope. That reality demands stronger leadership in the music business than in many other industries.

Leadership in the music industry

Regardless of role, experience level, job security, or satisfaction, every person shares a basic need: to be respected, treated with dignity, and to find meaning in work and life. William J. Byron argued that human dignity is the bedrock of both personal and social ethics, but notes it takes a beating in corporate culture. When companies downsize, workers at all levels are treated like disposable parts. “Bottom lines and balance sheets,” he notes, “often need more attention than human beings who lose their jobs.”

These painful practices violate the psychological contract previously established between employer and employee—a global shift visible across many organizations. Human resources courses often emphasize this problem, dedicating entire assignments to the implications of breaching that contract. The music industry may have a slight advantage here, because certain resources cannot be replaced: vocal talent, compositional talent, and other repertoire-related strengths. Still, that durability cuts both ways.

There are many forms of leadership, and each is more or less effective depending on context. Becoming a successful musician demands relentless talent, commitment, and conviction. Once an artist establishes herself, that investment effectively guarantees job security, but the high stakes mean every band member must remain ethical and trustworthy. The music entertainment business is fiercely competitive. Very few musical entrepreneurs ever achieve stardom or make music their day job. Breaking through demands years of physical, emotional, and financial effort. Musicians must often work other jobs to fund their entrepreneurial musical projects. For those lucky enough to be in the industry, collaboration and mutual support become vital. Without a strongly supportive work environment and a stellar work ethic, success may remain out of reach. Tough situations often call not only for strong leadership but also for strong followership. Transformational leadership fits because it is rooted in genuine concern for fellow workers, which helps everyone function harmoniously.

Transformational leadership draws on what Manning calls "sympathetic understanding." Such leaders respond to other people’s needs and look after the organization's goals without undermining anyone’s sense of competence or dignity. They address employee suffering where possible. Manning argues that leaders, no matter how professional their settings, share two foundational human relationships: one is the basic relationship shared between fellow creatures, and the second is the immediate relationship between someone’s needs and another person’s ability to fill them.

These principles are especially relevant within a band. Musicians work intricately and intimately. They need a collective spirit to endure long tours, far from family and friends, with their careers literally on the line. Absent sympathetic understanding and a capacity to mediate, low morale alone can mean the collapse and dissolution of the whole group.

Leders of bands must also shoulder a certain level of corporate social responsibility. The music industry contains many hidden layers of management, so "integrative theories" matter. Business management must recognize and integrate social expectations so that the enterprise aligns with prevailing social values. In entertainment, responding to social moods and marketplace tastes is not optional: it drives sales. The microeconomics of music places it in a hybrid space between a commodity market and a matching market. Music must reach a listener's heart before it reaches their wallet. People do not connect to music they cannot relate to. Venue owners do not book musicians they cannot trust. So corporate social responsibility is crucial. A transformational leader can help. But a participative leader who is also transformational may do even better than a lone charismatic figure.

Given that musicians often stand in the public eye, they have unusual potential to lead the world—even without holding political or governmental office. They do not write laws or set public policy. Yet they influence others because admiration flows naturally from enjoyment of music. Admiration is itself a powerful and reliable source of influence.

Therefore, musicians must constantly remind themselves that their choices reach far beyond their immediate workplace. Their workplace does not stay confined to an office or a venue. One may work in a studio or perform at concerts, but a musician’s reach extends outward to the lives of fans—essentially, customers. That interaction never truly ends. The work demands deep and durable commitment. This is why the music industry needs transformational leaders brave enough to bear that weight.

The weight of their work’s impact makes it essential for musicians to be led by example. Practicing humility, kindness, and serving in multiple roles helps them understand not only their own tasks but also those of others. They must treat everyone with the respect and dignity they deserve.

In chapter nine of the anthology Making organizations competitive, by Kilmann et al., author Kelley, R. (1991, p. 195) strongly emphasizes the value of merging leadership and followership into a robust partnership. Followers are as vital to organizations and workplaces as leaders. It is crucial for leaders—especially transformational ones—to recognize and embrace this, particularly those working in the music industry and specifically leaders of bands.

Band leaders work very intimately with their colleagues. “Leaderships and partnerships are roles, not people. People assume followership or leadership roles as one of the many roles they play in society. Most of us play simultaneous leader and follower roles.” Consequently, workplace success stems from both strong leadership and strong followership. When crediting a leader, the supporting players—the followers—must not be overlooked. Effective followers can often function without an effective leader, yet effective leaders may not be able to function without effective followers, because being a leader requires at least a basic level of followership.

Supporting players frequently emerge as leaders themselves. Supportive leaders tend to become effective transformational leaders. These transformational leaders pay attention to their supporting players, who in turn may become leaders, sparking a web of participative and transformational leadership. This can only occur when follower–leader partnerships are built through the transference and transformation of leadership into a participative format, by “making the previously designated skills a joint responsibility and utilising followers in the process.” Kelley, R. (1991, p. 124) notes that strategic mistakes are often made by neglecting followers as potential contributors, wasting a valuable asset.

This ineffective use of assets is quite apparent in the leadership style of Nightwish’s leader, Tuomas Holopainen. Floor Jansen, former singer and songwriter of After Forever and current lead singer of Nightwish, stated in a video interview with Face Culture that she would love to contribute to the band’s musical creation process. However, with Tuomas in charge, she said doing so is impossible, as he insists on being the sole contributor to the songwriting process. Although Nightwish has been a successful band since 1996, any fan who follows the band and watches interviews knows they lack stability: they have gone through three different lead singers, and members getting along has been a constant struggle. Holopainen has even stated in interviews that if Floor leaves, Nightwish will not replace her—they will simply stop being a band, because replacing singers so many times has been too taxing.

Tuomas Holopainen employs a very authoritative and directive leadership style. While that style may have some benefits, it may not be the most effective one in a band context. In several video interviews, band members admit that during tours they spend more time with each other than with their families back home. Working in such an intimate setting, especially in a role heavily dependent on social interaction and friendship, calls for a far more effective blend of participative and transformational leadership. Every band member is an equal contributor when performing music, whether on stage during tours or in recordings. Therefore, effective partnership combined with a transformational and participative leadership style would be entirely logical. Morale among band members would likely be higher if each person contributed to all aspects of the band, at least to some degree.

Though a specific leadership style may be preferred, it is important to remember that the best approach does not always fit a single model. Keeping an open mind and remaining receptive to various options allows for constant learning and growth. Riel and Martin (2017, p. 30) state that leadership “models are unhelpfully singular” and that, “our models tend to be narrow and singular. They aren’t singular in the sense that they apply only to one instance. In fact, evidence suggests that we overestimate the degree to which a model applies in one situation can also be applied more broadly.” They argue that just because one model fits a particular situation perfectly does not mean it will or will not fit another scenario. They advocate working fluidly with models, moving in and out of them according to the needs of an organization, a workplace, or a given circumstance. They also stress the importance of examining a model’s objectives, the key assumptions behind it, the conditions where it worked best and where it failed, and then applying those insights to assess ongoing use of the model. Their point is valid because life and reality cannot be confined to a chart—the world is not black and white but lies in shades of gray.

These factors also explain why bands need equal contribution and participation from all members. The nature of the required leadership may not neatly fit into the “transformational leadership” box, even though it may be a predominantly strong model. Part of being a transformational leader in a band—given the circumstances and the nature of the work—may actually involve enabling participative leadership among members. That ability could itself become part of a transformational leadership style in these contexts. The style in this situation is not singular, like an isolated point in space, but rather a web of styles woven into a holistic network.

Overcoming Leadership Challenges in the Music Industry

It is essential for leaders in the music industry to be resourceful and knowledgeable in many areas, especially crisis management, because musicians are vulnerable to copyright lawsuits from the slightest production mistake—copyright laws have become stricter in the modern world. When copyright protection was first enacted in 1790, content was protected for fourteen years, with an option to renew for another fourteen if the creator was still alive. Today, even though innovation happens more quickly, copyright laws are far more stringent, protecting works for ninety-five years. This means that if several measures in a song resemble any song up to ninety-five years old from another artist, the band could face a copyright infringement lawsuit and serious legal and financial trouble. Such a severe crisis would require a leader with high emotional intelligence who can defuse the situation.

Despite these copyright challenges, bands also benefit from having little to no marginal cost of production, because they can operate predominantly as a digital firm. As McKenzie, R. B. (2003, p. 71) stated, “For the digital firm, there is no (or little) marginal cost of production that can constrain sales, which means that all the digital firm has to do is maximise sales on its product and the complement.”

However, the advantage of low or no marginal cost from digital operation is not without struggles. McKenzie, R. B. (2003, p. 250) also noted that piracy in computer software is a global issue affecting all digital firms. It is so pervasive that digital pirates have their own vocabulary and codewords, often bypassing system security by changing a letter or two in traditional spelling, in addition to using their own coded language. He describes some of these terms, saying copied computer games are often called “gamez. Pirates also have several other terms that denote operations that are critical to their trade, for example, crackz, broken software codes that allow pirates to convert a software firm’s demonstration software version into full-blown program and serialz, which denotes serial numbers for copied software programs.”

Musicians are affected by this problem, because when they perform in a digital space vulnerable to piracy, their work risks constant copying and reproduction, which means lost sales. They sometimes face the risk of someone else fraudulently patenting their intellectual property, or competitors creating similar works by finding ways around copyright laws.

Consequently, they may need the strength to use what Porter, M. E. (1980, p. 85-86) calls “market signals.” He writes: “A form of signal related to the cross-parry is the fighting brand. A firm threatened or potentially threatened by another can introduce a brand that has the effect— whether this is the only motivation for the brand or not— of punishing or threatening to punish the source of the threat. For example, Coca-Cola introduced a new brand called Mr. Pibb in the mid-1970s which tasted very much like Dr. Pepper, a brand that was gaining market share. Maxwell House introduced a coffee brand called Horizon, which had similar characteristics and package design to Folger’s, in some markets where Folger’s was seeking to gain position. Fighting brands can be meant as warnings or deterrents or as shock troops to absorb the brunt of a competitive attack. If a firm files a private antitrust suit challenging a competitor, it can be taken as a signal of displeasure or in some cases as harassment or delaying tactic. Private suits can thus be viewed a lot like cross-parries. Since a private suit can be dropped at any time by initiating firm, it is potentially a mild signal of displeasure relative to, for example, a competitive price cut.”

Though these market signals may be necessary, they must be handled carefully with tact so they do not go too far. When authorizing or using such signals, leaders must be people who know when and how to exercise balance. It is important not to let the various conflicts surrounding business operations become so all-consuming that they cannot function, whether those conflicts come from external markets or internal organizational issues.

Resolving Conflict and Moving Forward

Gerzon, M. (2006, p. 1) eloquently stated: “Every one of us leads a life with conflict. It is everywhere: from organisations that are divided about their strategy and roles to local communities that are divided by race, economics, religion, or politics; from homes torn apart by chronic feuds between parents and children, siblings, or in countries that are torn apart by civil strife. If we add these ‘hot conflicts’ (strong emotions, loud voices, visible tension) the many others that are ‘cold’ (suppressed emotions, tense silence, invisible stress), we must admit to ourselves that conflict is part of our lives. Although hot and cold conflicts are as different as summer and winter, they both have destructive consequences if handled poorly. They produce chronic inefficiency in our organisations, strive in our communities and turmoil in our lives.”

With this statement, he establishes conflict resolution as an essential skill for leaders. He then emphasizes the need for a new leadership model that places conflict at the center as a critical test for leadership, enabling leaders to use conflict as an asset rather than a liability. His focus on conflict is not misplaced, as conflict is indeed unavoidable—few people have gone through life entirely without it.

He proposes a leadership model with three faces: Demagogue, Manager, and Mediator. Among these, the “Mediator” shares characteristics that could greatly benefit a transformational leader in a band. He defines the mediator as “a person who serves as an intermediary to reconcile differences.” He states that “mediators have the critical capacity to see the whole— and to act in its best interest” and that they strive to act on behalf of the whole, not just a part, while thinking systemically and committing to ongoing learning.

Using analogies, he says mediators build “trust by building bridges across the dividing lines, seeking innovation and opportunity in order to transform conflict.” He describes an integral vision.

Such leaders possess this integral vision, enabling them to be effective by using conflict to unite people resolution. Given conflict’s complex nature, this approach is fundamentally transformational, because people typically view conflict negatively, but this method sees it as something to be transformed into the positive.

Gerzon’s approach could apply particularly well to bands, because being in a band is almost like marriage. A group of people works together for extensive periods, without the structure of a forty-hour work week. They share the same mode of transportation for long hours, attend events packed closely together, and may even sleep under the same roof. They work so intimately that they share the most important parts of their lives. This creates a human relationship that surpasses the professional relationship, making it very difficult to separate personal and professional spheres. Such closeness can lead to more incidents of conflict. Hence, being a leader in this scenario may be like being a “teacher intervening between two quarrelling children.” Though that role may sound strange or far-fetched, it is a real possibility. Anyone who has committed to the performing arts for an extended period knows this. This is another reason why participative attributes within a transformational style are critically important, as is the ability to shift between the roles of leadership, followership, and partnership in such a setting. The ability to disagree with others agreeably is crucial, as is the capacity for critical thinking—without it, interacting with coworkers in this setting would be extremely challenging. No two people are exactly alike, so opinions differ, making conflict extremely likely.

The capacity for self-management and mediation helps de-escalate situations and keep everyone motivated. Making ethical choices and avoiding groupthink transforms the workplace into an effective working and learning environment. To achieve this, individuals must act responsibly and align their personal and professional values and commitments. Only when leaders, followers, and partners collaborate to reach a common goal, working in a truly integral fashion, can they succeed in their collective endeavors. A transformational leadership style can facilitate this, because caring keeps the human heart beating longer than it has to, and positively impacting the world creates a better reality for everyone. Transformational leaders in the music industry hold the distinct gift of

far-reaching influence. Using that gift to its fullest could help achieve global goals simply by demonstrating that far-fetched dreams and ambitions can become real—by being the positive example the world needs for change to occur.

References

Allhoff, F., Vaidya, A. J., & Sager, A. (2017). Business in ethical focus: An anthology (2nd ed.). Peterborough, Ontario, Canada: Broadview Press.

Belcourt, M., & McBey, K. (2016). Strategic human resources planning (6th ed.). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.

Brucken Fock, M. V. (2017, March 20). DPRP.net • Interviews • Interview with Floor Jansen of Nightwish. Retrieved April 17, 2018, from http://www.dprp.net/interviews/2017-001/

Byron, W. J. (2006). Chapter 6: Human Dignity. In The power of principles: Ethics for the new corporate culture (p. 89). Maryknoll: Orbis.

Chau, V. S., & Witcher, B. (2014). Strategic management: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). Andover, Hampshire: UK: Cengage Learning.

Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (n.d.). Chapter 9: Corporate social responsibility theories. In Business in Ethical Focus: An Anthology (2nd ed., p. 70). Petersborough, Ontario: Canada: Broadview Press.

Gerzon, M. (2006). Leading through conflict: How successful leaders transform differences into opportunities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Greenleaf, R. K., Spears, L. C., Covey, S. R., & Senge, P. M. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into

Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.

Suomalainen, N. (2015, May 25). YLEX. “Tuomas Holopainen: Floor Jansen will be Nightwish's last singer” Retrieved April 19, 2018, from https://yle.fi/ylex/uutiset/tuomas_holopainen_floor_jansen_tulee_olemaan_nightwishin_viimeinen_laulaja/3-8015464

Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2012). Macrowikinomics: Rebooting business and the world. Toronto: Penguin Canada.

Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (n.d.). Managing to be ethical. In Business in Ethical Focus: An Anthology (2nd ed., p. 27). Broadview Press.